|
|
|
|||||||
|
HealthyPlace.comAbout Us InformationDiseases and
Conditions Community & EventsBulletin
Boards
|
Title: Electroshock and Informed ConsentSubject(s): INFORMED consent (Medical law); ELECTROCONVULSIVE therapy Source: Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Winter2000, Vol. 40 Issue 1, p65, 15p, 1bw Author(s): Breeding, John Abstract: Informed consent is a vital issue in all forms of medicine, especially in psychiatry, where patients are often in extremely vulnerable states of mind, customary practice involves high risk to patients, and the law allows for abrogation of traditional civil rights based on judgments of perceived mental incompetence. This article addresses informed consent related to the practice of electroshock. The author argues that genuine informed consent for electroshock is nonexistent because psychiatrists deny or minimize its harmful effects and, as long as the threat--overt or covert--of involuntary treatment exists, there can be no truly voluntary informed consent. The author discusses four primary ways psychiatry violates informed consent in electroshock practice and presents an outline of important information to know about electroshock. An annotated review of the research is provided to back up each of the author's assertions about medical effects and lack of efficacy of electroshock. ELECTROSHOCK AND INFORMED CONSENTSummaryInformed consent is a vital issue in all forms of medicine, especially in psychiatry, where patients are often in extremely vulnerable states of mind, customary practice involves high risk to patients, and the law allows for abrogation of traditional civil rights based on judgments of perceived mental incompetence. This article addresses informed consent related to the practice of electroshock. The author argues that genuine informed consent for electroshock is nonexistent because psychiatrists deny or minimize its harmful effects and, as long as the threat--overt or covert--of involuntary treatment exists, there can be no truly voluntary informed consent. The author discusses four primary ways psychiatry violates informed consent in electroshock practice and presents an outline of important information to know about electroshock. An annotated review of the research is provided to back up each of the author's assertions about medical effects and lack of efficacy of electroshock. Genuine informed consent for electroshock is nonexistent because electroshock psychiatrists deny or minimize its harmful effects. For example, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) (1990) states, "In light of the available evidence, `brain damage' need not be included [in the consent form] as a potential risk" (p. 68). In addition, in all but one state, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may be legally forced on nonconsenting individuals who are adjudicated mentally unqualified to give their consent. The undergirding of psychiatry is coercive. Society generally respects the right of citizens to refuse treatment of physical illnesses, however life-threatening, except for "mental illness." As long as the threat (overt or covert) of involuntary treatment exists, there can be no truly voluntary informed consent. There are many ways in which informed consent is violated; I will mention four. First, there is denial and minimization of harmful effects. The official APA literature and the typical hospital brochure are both travesties of truth. The consent form example provided by the APA (1990) in The Practice of Electroconvulsive Therapy states that the death rate for ECT is "approximately one per 10,000 patients treated" (p. 157). Publicly available statistics collected between 1993 and 1996 by the Texas Mental Health Department show that the rate is 50 times higher. As noted above, the APA suggests that patients need not be advised of ECT's potential risk. The APA gives no credence to the numerous human autopsies, brainwave studies, animal studies, clinical observations, and reports from ECT subjects clearly demonstrating ECT's brain-damaging effects (see Appendix B). In 1994, St. David's Hospital in Austin, Texas, gave an information sheet to ECT candidates that stated ECT was safe for pregnant women.
advertisement A third point with regard to how informed consent principles are violated is rarely mentioned. Dr. Fred Baughman, a retired neurologist, in a letter to United States Attorney General Janet Reno, points out that the legal obligation under informed consent is to provide patients with all the information relevant to their decision making--not just about the treatment in question but also about their condition. Psychiatric patients are never told that their alleged disease is theoretical or metaphorical. To quote Baughman (personal correspondence, September 10, 1998),
Fourth, and pragmatically crucial, is simply that people become victims of this so-called "treatment" at a time in life when they are extremely vulnerable. At vulnerable times, individuals desperately need to trust and rely on others for help. Reaching out, they need complete safety and support. Their only hope, in this desperate state, is to trust the wisdom and guidance of the professionals to whom they turn for help. Informed consent is a superlative principle, but, in practice, it is not a protection. Nevertheless, for educational purposes, I provide here an example of what authentic informed consent would involve. I encourage you to copy and share this form with others. An annotated review of the research by Moira Dolan, M.D., provided to back up each of my assertions about medical effects and lack of efficacy, is in Appendix B. AUTHENTIC INFORMED CONSENT FOR ELECTROSHOCKYou are being asked to consider undergoing the psychiatric procedure of electroshock, commonly referred to as electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). It is your right, according to Texas state law, to be fully informed about the nature and effects of this procedure. This is so that should you choose to receive electroshock, your consent will be authentic, based on full knowledge and awareness. Of course, you also have the right to refuse the procedure. Prerequisites to Informed Consent State of Mind A fundamental requisite of genuine informed consent is mental competence. This means that prospective patients are able to understand this information and make a decision. At minimum, 1. Patient is free from the influence of any and all mood-altering substances, including legally prescribed psychotropic medications. 2. Patient is evaluated by a nonpsychiatric physician, preferably a neurologist. A mental-status examination is required to reveal a well-oriented mind and adequate functioning of higher level decision-making processes. 3. Patient is functionally literate: able to read and comprehend this written material. Alternatively, he or she is able to clearly understand the communication of this material to him or her by audiotape. State of Body A complete physical examination by a nonpsychiatric physician, preferably an internist, is recommended. The internist should evaluate for, and inform the patient and psychiatrist of, the potential of the individual to sustain physical complications of ECT treatment. This is analogous to what an internist does in a preoperative evaluation for surgery. Your Condition You are labeled as "mentally ill," diagnosed with a particular "disease" for which ECT is being recommended as "treatment." ECT is being justified as a "treatment" based on the assertion that your "disease" (probably called depression, but possibly some other "disease" such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia) is a biologically or genetically based illness. Your label of "mentally ill" and diagnosis of "major depression" or other "mental illness' is entirely hypothetical, based on subjective reports and observations of mood and behavior. There is no evidence of disease, chemical imbalance, or anything physically or chemically abnormal to validate your diagnosis with a medical illness. What It Is The Procedure Electroshock involves the attachraent of electrodes to the temples outside one (unilateral) or both (bilateral) frontal lobes and the administration of electricity to the frontal lobes of the brain. Intensity of voltage may vary from approximately 70 volts to approximately 600 volts. Duration of the electrical current may vary from 0.5 to 4 seconds. Administration of ECT also varies enormously in number of treatments, from one to literally hundreds, over time. A typical course of treatment involves 6 to 12 sessions. Multiple monitored ECT is a variation that consists of three treatments in I session, spaced about 5 minutes apart, with 3 sessions in I week; thus, nine treatments in I week. In making your decision, it is important that you know the following: 1. The natural electrical activity of the brain is measured in millivolts, or thousandths of a volt. Thus, the power of ECT is literally hundreds of thousands of times greater than natural brain electrical activity. 2. The ECT procedure involves a level of electricity that can range from the minimum level required to induce a convulsion to 40 times greater than that level (Sackeim, Devenand, & Prudic, 1991). The official APA recommendation ranges from 1.5 to 3 times the level required to induce a convulsion (APA, 1990). Drugs Administered Each of these drugs has a wide range of effects on your body, mind, and emotions, including but not limited to the possible adverse reactions that are listed below. You can look up this information at the library in the Physicians Desk Reference (PDR) (1999) or at your local pharmacist's office in Drug Facts and Comparisons (1999). Anesthesia (i.e., Methohexital Sodium). Possible adverse reactions include circulatory depression, hypotension, peripheral vascular collapse, convulsions in association with cardiorespiratory arrest, respiratory depression, cardiorespiratory arrest, skeletal muscle hyperactivity, injury to nerves adjacent to injection site, seizures, emergence delirium, restlessness, anxiety, nausea, abdominal pain, pain at injection site, salivation, and headache. Tranquilizer (i.e., Valium). Possible adverse reactions include excessive sleepiness and drowsiness, confusion, restlessness, depression, crying, sobbing, delirium, hallucinations, dizziness, blurred vision, depressed hearing, unsteady gait, hypertension, hypotension, skin rash, nausea, and vomiting. Muscle Relaxant (i.e., Succinylcholine Chloride). Possible adverse reactions include skeletal muscle weakness; profound and prolonged skeletal muscle paralysis resulting in respiratory insufficiency and apnea, which require manual or mechanical ventilation until recovery; low blood pressure; flushing; heart attack; bronchospasm; wheezing; injection site reaction; and fever. Prior to granting consent for ECT, a patient will be provided a list of drugs to be administered for ECT and a complete list of the effects described in the PDR. FDA Classification The Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies ECT machines as Class III devices. This means that ECT is an experimental procedure, classified in the highest risk category by the FDA. Class III means that the machine has not gone through the rigorous FDA testing required of medical devices, including safety testing and efficacy assessments. Possible Medical Effects of ECT Note Because ECT is a high-risk, experimental procedure and because of the possibility of permanent brain damage, you may want to consider magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) brain scans before and after this procedure. Having a pre-ECT MRI and post-ECT MRI is one way to measure the possible physical effects of ECT on your brain. Negative Emotional Effects Many individuals who have undergone ECT report horrific emotional distress resulting from this procedure (see Appendix A for contacts with outlets for the voices of outspoken survivors of electroshock). Physical and mental debilitation, together with intense fear, shame, and hopelessness, often make life and recovery a tremendous challenge for people who undergo this procedure. Lack of Efficacy Research indicates the following 1. No lasting beneficial effects of ECT (Breggin, 1997; Rifkin, 1988). 2. Sham-ECT (where an individual is anesthetized and told he or she will receive ECT but actually does not) has the same short-term outcomes as actual ECT (Crow & Johnstone, 1986). 3. ECT does not prevent suicide. Suicide rates for those receiving ECT are no lower than non-ECT patients with similar diagnostic profiles (see Appendix B). Financial Disclosure The cost of ECT varies significantly. Cost of the procedure itself may vary from $100 to $300 per treatment for the psychiatrist's services. "Hidden" costs include fees for the anesthesiologist and the surgery suite (up to $800 combined per session), room and board at the hospital (usually $800-$1,300 per day at a private psychiatric hospital), psychotherapy charges by the psychiatrist (average $100-$150 per hour), consultant fees, and charges for whatever drugs are administered. Depending on the setting and whether you are inpatient or outpatient, there will be variable fees for the "operating room" and the hospital. Patients will receive and sign a full financial disclosure of all costs, in writing, prior to consent for this procedure. EDITOR'S NOTE: As the U.S. Surgeon General will soon issue a statement giving blanket approval to the use of ECT, many mental health consumers and activists are alarmed and angry. For information about this ongoing controversy, see these Web sites: www.MindFreedom.org and www.ect.org/statements/apa/contents.html REFERENCES American Psychiatric Association. (1990). The practice of electroconvulsire therapy: Recommendations for treatment, training and privileging (task force report). Washington, DC: Author. Benedict, A., & Saks, M. (1987, Summer). The regulation of professional behavior: Electroconvulsive therapy in Massachusetts. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 15, 247-275. Breggin, P. (1997). Consensus conference on ECT. In Brain-disabling treatments in psychiatry: Drugs, electroshock, and the role of the FDA. New York: Springer. Crow, T., & Johnstone, E. (1986). Controlled trials of electreconvulsive therapy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 462, 12-29. Drug facts and comparisons. (1999). St. Louis, MO: Wolters Kluwer. Physician's desk reference (53rd ed.). (1999). Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics. Rifkin, A. (1988). ECT versus tricyclic antidepressants in depression: A review of evidence. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 49(1), 3-7. Sackeim, H., Devenand, D., & Prudic, J. (1991). Stimulus intensity, seizure threshold and seizure duration. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14, 803-843. Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy. (1995). Informed consent for electroconvulsive therapy: A report on violations of patients' rights by St. Mary's Hospital, Madison, Wisc. (Available from Wisconsin Coalition for Advocacy, 16 N. Carroll St., Madison, WI 53703) Reprint requests: John Breeding, 2503 Douglas St., Austin, TX 78741; e-mail: john@wildestcolts.com. APPENDIX A Additional Resources
Breggin, P. (1991). Shock treatment is not good
for your brain. In Toxic psychiatry: Why therapy, empathy, and love must
replace the drugs, electroshock, and biochemical theories of the new
psychiatry. New York: St. Martin's. BRAIN DAMAGE More than 20 years ago, Cotman reported in
Science that ECT disrupts (protective) protein production by brain cells. More
recent studies show that electric shocks to the brain also cause an increase in
the production of inflammatory proteins inside brain cells. CARDIOVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS ECT-induced seizures cause a rapid rise in
blood pressure; at the same time, the brain experiences a significant reduction
in blood flow. EXTRA RISKS IN THE ELDERLY In an analysis of 34 persons over the age of
85 who were subjected to ECT, researchers at the Mayo clinic documented that
79% suffered treatment complications, including a 32% incidence of confusion
and delirium, a 67% incidence of transient high blood pressure, and an 18%
incidence of serious heart arrhythmias during treatment. There were 2 patients
with other cardiogram changes, 3 patients who took falls, and i patient with a
hip fracture due to a fall. EPILEPSY In a review of the literature on the
well-known ECT complication of epilepsy, researchers calculated "that the
age-adjusted incidence of new seizures after ECT was fivefold greater than the
incidence found in the nonpsychiatric population (Devinsky & Duchowny,
1983). MEMORY LOSS Publicly available data from the state of
California's Department of Mental Health reveals that more than 99% of ECT
recipients complain of memory loss 3 months following treatment, with the
average number of ECT sessions being five to six. LACK OF EFFICACY In the large New York study cited earlier, the
death rates from suicide among depressed patients given ECT were slightly
higher at the 1-year mark. By 5 years, the suicide rate was the same for
depressed patients who got ECT as for those who did not. By John Breeding JOHN BREEDING, Ph.D. is a licensed psychologist in private practice in Austin, Texas. A significant part of his work involves counseling and consulting with parents and children. He also works with adults in psychotherapy, including many who are self-identified as psychiatric survivors. He is active in challenging various aspects of psychiatric oppression, in particular the practices of electroshock and the use of psychiatric drugs with school-age children. His book, The Wildest Colts Make the Best Horses, is a forceful and informative challenge to the use of stimulant drugs with millions of our children. Dr. Breeding has been on the advisory board of the World Association of Electroshock Survivors and has been active in the effort to ban electroshock in the state of Texas. His website, www.wildestcolts.com, is a valuable resource on psychiatry-related issues. top | sitemap | send page to a friend about me |
effects of ect | news
stories | personal stories |
|
||||||
|
HealthyPlace.com Homepage © 2000-2008 HealthyPlace.com, Inc. All
rights reserved. |
||||||||